Friday

On Bioethics

A fundamental question for talking about bioethics, is: to what ethical code we are appealing? 

"If there is no absolute beyond man's ideas, then there is no final appeal to judge
between individuals and groups whose moral judgments conflict. We are merely left with
conflicting opinions." (Francis Schaeffer, How Should We Then Live? p. 145)

"[W]e can rationally discuss and argue with each other about right and wrong without
resorting to the claim that ethical judgments are merely subjective or relative and that all
such judgments have equal validity. For to claim the latter logically leads one to the
bizarre judgment that Mother Teresa is no more and no less virtuous than Adolf Hitler." Frank Beckwith

In 1857, a certain controversial issue was starting to be debated. Dred Scott was being told by the court that he was not a citizen and therefore did not have certain rights. Lincoln called slavery a great evil, but Douglas replied each state should decide moral issues for themselves. Lincoln referenced Mark 3:25 in saying "A house divided against itself cannot stand."

If I may point out something. It has been said that slavery "fueled the economy" , but would we agree in hindsight this hardly justifies it?

Rep. Xavier Becerra pointed out in a recent interview that almost 500,000 new jobs were created in the health care sector since the passage of the Affordable Care. Is there the potential, that in hindsight, we will hardly find this a justiciation, as well?

"Whoever sheds man's blood, by man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God He made man"
Genesis 9:6



"Deliver those who are drawn toward death, And hold back those stumbling to the slaughter"
Provers 24:11




"who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them."
Romans 1:3



 

No comments: